The Great Council House Gravy Train

There is a well known saying ‘the road to hell is often paved with good intentions’, and back in 1980 when Margaret Thatcher announced that people would have the right to buy council houses, I am sure she thought this was a great idea – After all, it would give people who could otherwise not afford to buy a house the chance of property ownership, whilst at the same time, fill the coffers of the government. ‘Winners all round’ was branded on a regular basis and a lot of people thought they had benefited from this policy.

It’s only now that we see the road to council housing ownership was paved with good intentions, but the truth is, it has lead our country down ‘the road to hell’!

According to recent figures published by the Daily Express, the housing benefit bill will soon top 20 billion pounds a year, and because of this, the current Tory government is suddenly trying to cap the amount that people can claim for their housing.

The Press have spent a lot of time demonising those that live in expensive properties paid for by our taxes, and yet is it fair to blame the people that live in these houses when there are no council houses left because the Tory government & successive governments sold them, and then failed to rebuild more to make up for the loss in housing stocks?

In my opinion the current situation with regard to housing benefits is a case of ‘the chickens have come home to roost’, and it could not have been better timed as we see yet another Conservative government in power.

Had this policy not been undertaken we would have been in a situation where those that required housing would now be in council houses paying the Government rent, instead of the current situation where our taxes are making a group of rich people even richer. Is that fair Mr Cameron?

Would you like a house for free? Or why not have 20 houses for free? There is no magic formula for this and if you have the investment money in the first place, then you too could benefit from one of the biggest gravy trains in the world.

It’s no wonder that overseas investors are flocking to our shores to buy up houses, because the truth is, if you can afford to get the mortgage, then the government will pay it off for you with practically zero risk! Yes! That’s zero risk! And this is the real crime aspect of the massive ‘council-housing-sell-off’ that the Tory Government is failing to discuss. Thanks to this policy, which was set-up some thirty years ago, we are now all paying the price of a short-sighted bill that has come back to bite us all firmly on the backside!

Unless successive governments start to rebuild the council housing stock then this problem is only going to get worse, and those that can afford to buy houses for letting to the councils will get richer and richer.

No wonder there is so much objection to putting a cap on the amount a person can claim for housing, because those who have bought and are renting to the councils are probably the ones who are shouting the loudest as they don’t want to see the gravy boat come to an end!

If we are to cut the housing bill then we are going to have to embark on a rapid council house building project otherwise the projected 20 billion pound bill will look like chicken feed when even more people are forced into expensive private renting paid for by councils because of housing shortages and lack of employment.

If we are looking to blame someone for the current situation that we find ourselves in then this blame should be firmly placed at the feet of Margaret Thatcher’s government and not the people who find themselves in a situation where they have no job and have to live in privately rented properties because of a shortfall in council houses.

Why should Tax payer’s money be used to make a few people very rich because of this short sighted policy and why are the press not focusing on this instead of trying to make it appear that people on the dole or who live in council paid properties are scroungers looking for an easy life?

If you have ever had the misfortune of being on the dole as I have then I can assure you that even with your housing paid, living on some £65 per week is no picnic! And despite the owners of these properties getting their mortgages paid for the properties that they rent are often sub standard and deliberately neglected until the need for the owner to sell.

Share
Posted in Current Events | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

How do you get a YouTube Video to auto play?

When you look for the solution to this the most common way to get your YouTube video to work is by adding the following code to the end of the link. ‘&autoplay=1’ This is Wrong! …….. Correct way

Share
Posted in HTML Help, The Internet | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Arab Spring? Or Desert Mirage?

Arab Spring or desert Mirage?

The Middle East reminds of that famous song Stuck in the Middle with You by Stealers Wheel.

Like a triangle with the Middle East in the Middle we currently watch China, Russia & the West with Iran on the outside figure out how they can once again carve up this region for their own needs. My money is on Iran becoming the Super Power of the Region as they infiltrate Iraq and settle their people into a land they once fought a bitter & bloody war over.

Well done America & the Allied forces for doing what Iran could never have done on its own!

Share

Posted in Current Events, World Events | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

I can connect to the internet with the cable but I cannot connect to the internet using wireless.

My wireless shows I am connected but I cannot connect to the internet

Why can I connect to the internet with the cable but I cannot connect using wireless?

After years of working my friends wireless internet connection suddenly stopped working and would connect, then fail; yet the Wi-Fi manager did not show a fault……….. read more

Share
Posted in The Internet, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

How Technology will force the change from Capitalism to a form of Socialism (part 1)

The Western World has reached a point where further advances in technology are destroying jobs rather than creating them, and this is resulting in a situation where eventually there will be more people unemployed than employed.

If this happens we will witness civil unrest on a scale that has not yet been seen. Unless this dilemma is confronted and radical new ways in our thinking about what work is and the way recourses are distributed amongst us, then we are doomed to a period that could see us reverting back to the dark ages.

Even places like China are not immune to the progression of technology. China is currently in a situation where employing people works out cheaper than investing in computerisation and mechanisation. However, as China’s wealth grows, its people will no longer be content with low wages and will start to demand higher pay.  When this point is reached, the Chinese will do what every other country has done and that is to give into the demands of its people, and then look for ways to make their businesses more competitive in the form of introducing computers and machines, because wages have become more expensive than investing in mechanism.

The announcement of factories being built to create thousands of jobs is becoming less and less frequent.

Automated FactoryTechnology has now progressed to such an extent that there are factories producing machines to make machines. At the same time there are factories that employ people to do jobs based on economic subsidies from government & local councils. From personal experience, these jobs are often low paid, monotonous and repetitive and could easily be replaced by machines, however, by doing so would drastically reduce the employment within a local area. Councils know this and thus make generous subsidies to keep these companies employing people.

As each new factory is built, fewer and fewer people are required, yet production often skyrockets as machines run 24 hours a day and require no wages, they do not strike, need sick leave or holidays. It’s true that the investment in this technology can cost millions of pounds. As time progresses and the technology improves, the costs come down and soon we will start to see it trickle into all aspects of the work environment.

Supermarkets, which have always been a large employer, are now using more and more automated checkouts that require far fewer people to operate – some smaller outlets are becoming entirely automated.

Automated Checkouts in Supermarkets will remove jobs from this sectorI can remember speaking to a supermarket employee about 3 years ago and asking them if they were not worried about the automated checkouts taking their job? They categorically denied that this would happen. I wonder if they would still argue that point after witnessing their supermarket go from 4 automated checkouts to 16, which now only require 3 members of staff for a 24 hour period.

If we take 16 checkouts and run the store 24 hours per day, then that would have required a minimum of 2 people per 24 hour shift. Therefore, to operate those 16 checkouts would have taken approximately 32 people to run.

Those same 16 checkouts today now only take 3 people!

Multiple these over every supermarket, and you soon realise just how many jobs will be lost as more and more supermarkets are forced to automate their checkouts, just to keep up with their competitors.

The supermarkets are just one of many areas of our lives that are slowly seeing the jobs market reduce whilst production increases, and don’t for a minute think that your industry is immune to this.

Teaching is currently undergoing an Internet revolution where lessons could soon be taught over the Net with one teacher lecturing 60 people from their home.

Automated cars and heavy goods vehicles are providing everyday services – when that technology starts to mature, the need for lorry drivers, taxis, bus drivers, motorbike couriers, ambulance drivers, fire engine drivers and many more will become redundant.

Planes, boats and trains require no pilot or driver, yet we employee these people because we cannot psychologically come to terms with a machine at the controls. However, as each generation is born, this fear will reduce and so will the jobs that are associated with these trades.

Call-centre software is so sophisticated that most people would not even know they are speaking to a machine and not a human.

Will future robots resemble the ones from i, Robot?Robots are still in their infancy, yet already we see humanoid-type machines capable of walking, climbing stairs and navigate their environments. How long will it take before this technology is so advanced that we see them doing menial tasks? 5, 10, 20, 30 or 50 years? Whatever the time span, the reality is that one-day it will arrive and be affordable.

This will not happen overnight, but instead, gradually, like a dripping-tap filling up a bath. It may take a while, but eventually it will fill the bath and so it will be with employment.

The drip-drip effect of technology will eventually lead to the scenario that I have discussed where jobs will be for the minority – this means that the majority of people may never get the chance to ever have a job according to what our current perception of a job is.

Under the current structure, there is no way a government could provide benefit payments for over half the population, and there is no way that over half the population would be content living on benefits.

It is true that there will always be entrepreneurs and micro-businesses that will employ people for specialist work, but these jobs will never be able to replace the whole scale loss of jobs created by the steady progression of technology.

Therefore our aspirations, what we own, the way we think about work, and the way we currently share the countries resources will have to be replaced by another system because Capitalism could not cope with the majority of people living off a State Welfare System, and moreover, this majority would not settle for a life on minimal payments, stuck-in-a-rut because they cannot afford to do anything else other then exist.

Next instalments: –

Addressing the problem.

Making the change.

A new beginning.

Share
Posted in Science & Technology, Thinking out the box | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is Bank of England’s £75bn Quantitative Easing Plan the Right Thing to Do?

The economy is stagnant, job losses are creeping up, wages are falling, inflation is now running at 5% per year with the consumer price index (CPI) forecast to also hit 5% by the end of the year, and what do we get once again from the men in power? More quantitative easing, which is going to lead to more inflation, more power to the banks as they decide who benefits from this windfall, and some great bonuses as bankers beat their targets by lending our money to businesses that might put it to good use.

Every day we hear the Government bleating about the fact they have no money to pay for vital services to vulnerable sections of our society, or how we will all have to bite the bullet and take the pain of lower wages, higher energy bills, crippling fuel prices and rapidly diminishing pension returns, yet out of the ether we have just witnessed the creation of some £75bn for quantitative easing, £250 million for weekly bin collections and £800 million thanks to the council tax freeze.

Pretty amazing stuff when you take into account that our country is suppose to be broke!

What happened? Did they rummage down the sofas at Conservative head quarters and find an IOU for £80bn from a Russian Oligarch? And now that they have found this money, is quantitative easing going to be the right thing to do with the loose change?

Well, to date, over £200bn has been spent in ‘easing’ our economy in the hope that it would create jobs and kick start industry, and despite the odd peak, the truth is that our economy is on the rocks and jobs are disappearing faster than a can of Special Brew at a tramp convention.

So, what else could have been done?

For me, I prefer the method that Mr. Obama has opted for, and that is to invest money directly into the economy in the form of civil projects.

The UK has a huge housing shortfall, record waiting lists, and despite the economy, house prices continue to rise based on scarcity.

With £75bn we could embark on a huge house-building project that would produce real tangible assets at the end of the project, ease the housing problem and employ thousands of people. A direct injection of this kind has immediate and long term benefits to society as a whole because we would see confidence return from the business generated by such a project.

It would also take the power away from the banks and put it firmly back in the hands of the government as they would be in charge of spending the money rather than watching business go cap-in-hand to the banks.

If we are to fight our way out of this recession, which is what Cameron wants, then the best way to do this would be to take on some large civil projects and spend the money in the local economy, rather than watch it disappear into the complex world of finance.

Share
Posted in Current Events | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Could Ed Miliband be the Conservatives greatest weapon against Labour?

Please forgive me Ed for what I am about to say, as I’m sure you’re a nice man and you have some great ideas, but when it comes to leading the opposition party you suck.
Unfortunately you don’t have the charisma or voice to become a great leader, or even a worthy opponent to the Caminator, and as we see the Conservatives U turn more times than a dog chases its tail, the only sounds we hear from the Labour leadership are the squeaks of opposition coming from the schoolboy in the playground, waving a red flag desperately trying to be noticed by the rest of us.
The best thing you could do right now is to fake a terminal illness and hand the leadership over to your brother, because if you don’t then I will be eating my hat for breakfast long before Labour has any chance of seriously challenging the slick, well-spoken Mr. Cameron.
As I have no intention of eating my hat, I fear that the chance of seeing any real opposition to the current government is about as likely as me stopping dogs from chasing their tails!
So do yourself a favour and take a step back to save your party from the humiliation that is about to come should you be leader when you battle on the political battlefield of the next elections.

Share
Posted in Current Events | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Cat Caught Watching Porn

It’s been a while since I did a post so I thought I would start with a serious topic!

No matter what you are, if you surf the Web then you will inevitably end up viewing porn!

Share
Posted in Humor | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

What we need is common sense to fight the riots and nothing more!

David Cameron has talked a lot about how he is going to get tough on the rioters who caused chaos and destruction to UK cities last week.

However, the truth is that for all his talk, the reality will be that half of what Mr. Cameron is proposing will never make it passed the European Courts. Already we read in the newspapers that a woman facing eviction due to her son being caught looting is threatening to sue the police for brutality against her son! And the scary thing is that she will probably win and walk away with even more of our money accompanied by a smiling kid.

In another more serious case where a boy raped a thirteen-year-old girl, people were already making excuses for his actions and claiming that he had ‘problems’. Yes, he does have a very big problem and that is he raped a thirteen-year-old girl! If he is old enough to loot and rape then he is old enough to face the consequences of his crimes.

And that’s where the problems of our modern day society start – Facing the consequences of your crime or not facing them at all!

Time and time again we read in the newspapers that it was society’s fault, the fault of the individual’s upbringing, poverty, alcohol, drugs, mental-health problems, the government, and so on.

Then there are a whole host of professionals who tell the perpetrators that it wasn’t their fault, which results in these ‘sick’ people believing that it really wasn’t their fault!

This on its own is enough to create a generation who will grow up thinking that it’s ok to do what they want because it ‘isn’t their fault’.

But when you combine this with the fact that parents, teachers and the law cannot chastise children for doing wrong, you are sitting on a time-bomb that will repeatedly explode until the feral start to realise there are penalties for breaking society’s laws, and that these penalties will be painful.

As with everything, we tend to go from one extreme to another before we find the middle-ground, and society as a whole is now seeing the product of going from a past situation where children had no rights, to modern day where now they have all the rights, which means that they have become the new ‘untouchables’.

This swing has had over twenty years to mature, and now we see parents and their offspring growing-up with no discipline, coupled with the belief that society owes them everything.

In our zeal to be liberal, we have successfully created a society where to under-achieve, be antisocial or repeatedly commit crimes is actually rewarded with holidays, day-trips, and computers, yet those that obey rules of society get nothing. Where having a large family gets you a big house despite the fact that you have never worked a day in your life. Where dishwashers and Sky TV are common in households that have never worked, yet people who work forty hours per week can’t afford them. Where to have children by different fathers actually pays out more benefits than staying with a single partner, and to live together actually reduces your benefits… the list goes on.

Yet this could all have been prevented by some simple common sense and a long-term strategy by policy makers who have the power to fight the minority parties who make so much noise and trouble for society as a whole, just because they can scream the loudest.

What do I mean by common sense?

Well, that part is easy and it starts by rewarding the good people and punishing the bad.

1)      Rather than send the top offenders on day-trips etc., it would make far more sense to reward the top ten achievers, and this does not have to be based on an academic level only. I would far rather see taxpayers’ money reward adults and children for their positive contribution to society and charitable work as opposed to those who choose to destroy our society. Why not set aside a percentage of the National Lottery, backed with taxpayers money to reward society’s angels?

2)      Stop giving people houses and flats just because they exist! Council owned houses should go to those who work and have low incomes first, and not to immigrants and people who have never worked a day in their lives or not contributed towards society. We need to house people, but I would rather see simple boarding houses where those who have arrived in our country and are looking for a better way of life can stay, along with our own nationals who have not yet worked or contributed. Would this not then encourage people to go out and find work if they want a better way of life? And, when they do find work, they then have earned their right to move on into a Council owned property.

3)      Stop rewarding large families with bigger State benefits – Everyone has the right to have children, but it is not society’s responsibility to pay for people to have as many children as they want without ever having to have worked. Benefits should be capped at two children and any more have to be financed by that money.

4)      Come down harsh on guns and knives – Anyone caught walking the streets with a knife or gun should get a minimum of fives years and repeat offenders should get life. That would make a person think twice if they knew that getting caught meant a lengthy sentence.

5)      Bring back strong discipline – I, like many millions of other people, grew-up during an age where to swear at a copper meant a clip ‘round the ear by the copper, followed by the belt from my mum or dad. To be unruly in a class meant dodging a piece of chalk or a getting the cane from the headmaster, and whilst this didn’t work for everybody, the IMPORTANT factor was that it worked for MOST of us and it kept MOST of us in order. No method of punishment will work 100% of the time, but that is not the point. The point is that it works 90% of the time which means that 90% of us will abide by the laws because we fear the retribution of doing wrong.

6)      Make parents take responsibility for their children – Just what is going on at home when a nine year old is out on the streets on their own or with their mates after eight o’clock at night? Police should be dragging these kids back to their parents and if their parents can’t keep them in, then the kids should be put into care homes until the parents can show they are capable of parenting!

7)      Those that hold positions of power in our society and then abuse that power through corruption and hypocrisy should face stiff punishment so that we can see the same laws bind us all, rather than watch sections of our society escape justice based on wealth and power.

8)      Stop being hypocritical when it comes to alcohol and drugs. If you are going to allow one and regulate it, do the same for all. It has been proved time and time again that alcohol causes far more damage to society than most soft drugs do, and yet we force drugs underground and into the hands of gangsters whilst we openly sell and promote alcohol – this brings nothing but trouble to cities and towns throughout our land every day of the week. By legalising drugs, or decriminalising drugs, we would immediately free up our jails for the serious offenders, generate tax revenues from the sales, remove the power of the gangsters that control the trade, bring peace to our streets, and reduce crime on our streets by supplying junkies with their fixes rather than see them rob to supply their habit.

9)      Punish violent people – People who repeatedly use violence or intimidate others should face long prison sentences, and the more they do it, the longer each term becomes.

10)  And finally, we need to see policies supported by both parties and seen through to the end, despite the objections of the minority parties that constantly seem too manipulate the system at cost to all of us.

The truth is that the ‘Sick’ part of our society is going to take up to two maybe even three generations to heal, and if current and future governments don’t find the strength to see it through to the end, then anything they do in the short-term will be like sticking a plaster over a hole in a dam. Yes it will stop the leak for a while and bring immediate results, but in the end the water will gush through and the dam will burst making it much harder for those caught up in the ensuing flood to survive.

Share
Posted in Current Events | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Is banning the use of Social Networks really the way forward for a ‘Democratic’ country?

Banning of Social networks during civil unrestOnce again we are on the verge of witnessing our freedom of speech being eroded by a Government that is spending billions of pounds bringing ‘freedom of speech’ and democracy to foreign countries!

Less than four months ago we watched MPs condemn foreign governments for blocking access to websites and mobile networks, and then justify the use of armed force to allow the people of the Middle East the right to speak out against their leaders. Yet when the shoe is on the other foot it would appear that what had once been seen as a breech of basic human rights is now perfectly ok to do in our own country when it suits our leaders.

I, like many other people, am horrified at the looting and rioting that has been taking place in our cities by a minority of our society, and as far as I am concerned all those involved should receive the full force of our law. However, changing the law to ban social networking during troubled times is, in my opinion, a dangerous step backwards and highly hypocritical of our government. It makes a mockery of the reasons why we are currently involved in conflicts in the Middle East.

The problem with banning the use of social networks is, where does it stop?

If a legitimate demonstration against our government were being planned, then would this also mean that the government could close down the social sites in order to prevent the demonstrations, based on the possibility that there might be social unrest?

If I were to set-up a group that directly contradicted a government proposal, could this not be deemed as inciting social unrest?

Once we start down the road of blocking access to sites based on the excuse that it is inciting trouble then are we not doing what China and other dictators around the world do?

By allowing a minority to control the right to freedom of speech during troubled times, it is no different than allowing a dictator the right to take away its peoples’ right to demonstrate, and if these laws should be implemented then why the hell are we involved with other countries when our own laws prevent us from speaking out during social unrest in our own country?

If the government does decide to make this a serious proposition, then I plead with all that read this blog to stand-up and fight these proposed draconian measures, because to allow this to happen is to move away from democracy and all that our country is supposed to represent.

I have no sympathy for the looters involved in the recent civil unrest, but if we allow our government to further reduce our right to communicate during troubled times based on a minority of troublemakers then, in my opinion, the government is no better than the dictators that it is currently trying to overthrow.

Share
Posted in Current Events | Leave a comment